Banner Home Page
What is HEF? | Quality of Life
Monitoring
| Education &
Promotion
| Energy | Biodiversity
Partnership
| NHS
Environment
| Meeting Dates | Contacts | Links | Forum Members

'98 Update

Spacer

Site Map

Spacer
 

Introduction
Legislation
Transport
Energy
Wildlife & Habitats
Air Pollution
Waste
Land Use
White line
'97 Update
'99 Update
'01 Update
'02 Update

Water

Introduction

River quality in 1998 was lower than in previous measurement due to drought conditions in recent years. Rainfall has been very variable but there has been some recharge of underground water storage. In 1997-98 the average water demand for the people and industries of Hertfordshire was 301 million litres per day which was 3% lower than the previous year, with a peak demand of 351 million litres per day .

Indicator 1: Water Consumption

  • The average household per capita consumption of water in Hertfordshire for 1997/98 was 170 litres per head per day. This represents a 1.3% reduction from last year.

Reductions in leakage were better than the target for 1997/8 with total losses reduced from 171 to 148 million litres per day, an improvement of 13%. The volume saved would be sufficient to supply a population of 80,000, or a town approximately the size of Stevenage. If you spot a leak please report it to the Leakspotters Helpline - (0800) 3765325 and make a small practical contribution to the environment.

Indicator 2: River Quality

The Environment Agency monitors the chemical and biological quality of our rivers using a system that classifies river quality from A to F: A - Very Good B - Good C - Fairly Good D - Fair E - Poor F - Bad

River Quality in Hertfordshire Chart

River Map

  • 315km of river in Hertfordshire are classified under this system;
  • 35%, or 110km, of the rivers in Hertfordshire were of Very Good or Good quality (A and B) in 1995-7 compared to 57% in 1994-96, a decline of 22%;
  • 9%, or 30km, of the rivers in Hertfordshire were of Poor quality (E) in 1995-97 compared to 5% in 1994-96, an increase of 4%.

The decline in water quality is thought to be due to drought conditions in recent years, which have led to low flows and pooling of water. In turn, this has led to reductions in dissolved oxygen and reduced dilution of effluents. Underground water has not been replenished, further lowering river levels.

Indicator 3: River Quality Objectives

The river reaches that are monitored for their water quality also have River Quality Objectives (RQOs). The RQO scheme is based upon the recognised uses of a river. At present, objectives are only based on the River Ecosystem (RE). These address the chemical quality requirements of different types of aquatic ecosystems as outlined below:
Class RE1: Water of very good quality suitable for all fish species
Class RE2: Water of good quality suitable for all fish species
Class RE3: Water of fair quality suitable for all fish species
Class RE4: Water of fair quality suitable for coarse fish populations
Class RE5: Water of poor water quality which is likely to limit coarse fish populations

Compliance with these objectives is recorded as pass, marginal or fail. This system will be extended to other uses in the future. Objectives based on biological monitoring are to be introduced in the year 2000.
The length of river in Hertfordshire in each class in 1995-97 and the compliance with the RQO are shown in this graph:

River Quality Objectives Chart
  • 315km of river in Hertfordshire have a River Quality Objective;
  • 51% of the rivers passed their River Quality Objective in 1995-97, compared to 100% passing in 1994-96, a decline of 49%.

Again, this decline is thought to be due to drought conditions in recent years.

Water Resource

By the end of winter 1997/98 catchments in West Hertfordshire on the Chilterns had received on average 97% of normal rainfall but only 61% of normal recharge which is where rainfall percolates through the surface soils to the water naturally stored underground.

This reduced recharge from the rainfall was caused by the catchments not saturating till January. February was fairly dry and March wet, so by the end of March groundwater levels were still well below average, this being the third consecutive winter of below average recharge.

Exceptionally heavy rainfall in April brought several flood warnings and property floods but the heavy rain did produce significant recharge, with some areas having more recharge in April than the whole of the winter period combined.

The weather continued to be very variable with May being dry, June very wet and July and August dry. Averaged rainfall across the whole Thames region showed it was the driest July/August since records began in 1882. September saw a lot of rain and October was even wetter. The combination of slightly higher groundwater levels than last year and periods of heavy rainfall resulting in runoff from paved areas has kept rivers flows up this year.

For further information contact: John Mills, Environment Agency (01707) 632300