| What is HEF? | | | Quality of Life Monitoring |
| | Education & Promotion |
| | Energy | | | Biodiversity Partnership |
| | NHS Environment |
| | Meeting Dates | | | Contacts | | | Links | | | Forum Members |
|
'98 Update |
| Introduction |
| Legislation |
| Transport |
| Energy |
| Wildlife & Habitats |
| Air Pollution |
| Waste |
| Water |
| Land Use |
| Quality of Life Report 1992 |
| '97 Update |
| '99 Update |
| '01 Update |
| '02 Update |
|
Water Introduction River quality in 1998 was lower than in previous measurement due to drought conditions in recent years. Rainfall has been very variable but there has been some recharge of underground water storage. In 1997-98 the average water demand for the people and industries of Hertfordshire was 301 million litres per day which was 3% lower than the previous year, with a peak demand of 351 million litres per day . Indicator 1: Water Consumption
Reductions in leakage were better than the target for 1997/8 with total losses reduced from 171 to 148 million litres per day, an improvement of 13%. The volume saved would be sufficient to supply a population of 80,000, or a town approximately the size of Stevenage. If you spot a leak please report it to the Leakspotters Helpline - (0800) 3765325 and make a small practical contribution to the environment. Indicator 2: River Quality The Environment Agency monitors the chemical and biological quality of our rivers using a system that classifies river quality from A to F: A - Very Good B - Good C - Fairly Good D - Fair E - Poor F - Bad
The decline in water quality is thought to be due to drought conditions in recent years, which have led to low flows and pooling of water. In turn, this has led to reductions in dissolved oxygen and reduced dilution of effluents. Underground water has not been replenished, further lowering river levels. Indicator 3: River Quality Objectives The river reaches that are monitored for their water quality also
have River Quality Objectives (RQOs). The RQO scheme is based upon
the recognised uses of a river. At present, objectives are only based
on the River Ecosystem (RE). These address the chemical quality requirements
of different types of aquatic ecosystems as outlined below: Compliance with these objectives is recorded as pass, marginal or
fail. This system will be extended to other uses in the future. Objectives
based on biological monitoring are to be introduced in the year 2000.
Again, this decline is thought to be due to drought conditions in recent years. Water Resource By the end of winter 1997/98 catchments in West Hertfordshire on the Chilterns had received on average 97% of normal rainfall but only 61% of normal recharge which is where rainfall percolates through the surface soils to the water naturally stored underground. This reduced recharge from the rainfall was caused by the catchments not saturating till January. February was fairly dry and March wet, so by the end of March groundwater levels were still well below average, this being the third consecutive winter of below average recharge. Exceptionally heavy rainfall in April brought several flood warnings and property floods but the heavy rain did produce significant recharge, with some areas having more recharge in April than the whole of the winter period combined. The weather continued to be very variable with May being dry, June very wet and July and August dry. Averaged rainfall across the whole Thames region showed it was the driest July/August since records began in 1882. September saw a lot of rain and October was even wetter. The combination of slightly higher groundwater levels than last year and periods of heavy rainfall resulting in runoff from paved areas has kept rivers flows up this year. For further information contact: John Mills, Environment Agency (01707) 632300
|